Today we are posting an exclusive 9-page PDF of the latest motion filed by Karinna Moskalenko in regards to the ongoing harassment, gag orders, acts of intimidation, false statements, and interference on behalf of the Russian authorities toward counsel in this case. Given this fundamental disregard for an individual’s right to properly defend himself, I believe the conduct of the procuracy of the Russian Federation in this case can be compared to that of an organized criminal group, one whose activities should be condemned by every prosecutorial organization that attempts to uphold the rule of law. The Kremlin is clearly applying some lessons learned from the first round of attacks on Khodorkovsky and Yukos. Lesson No. 1 – when you want to want to carry out a highly unlawful show trial of a political prisoner, do so out of the public eye. For this reason the upcoming hearings will be taking place in the farthest reaches of Siberia, where the cancellation of a single flight can eliminate all observers (it is a violation of Russian law to hold the hearings in a different venue than the location of the alleged misconduct). Lesson No. 2 – when you want to invent perposterous new charges, make sure the media is barred from the proceedings. For this reason the next round of proceedings will be held inside the Chita Isolator prison facility, which will be able to deny the right of entry to anyone it chooses. Lesson No. 3 – when you want to make these ridiculous charges stick, begin an aggressive campaign of slander against the character of the defendent while at the same time prohibiting his lawyers from discussing the charges. For this reason, the procuracy has forced the Khodorkovsky defense team to sign a variety of strict non-disclosure agreements, which function as gag orders while the procuracy is free to speak to the media openly about the baseless allegations. If there remains any question whatsoever about the immense importance of Mikhail Khodorkovsky to Russia and the rest of the world, consider carefully the enormous illegitimate lengths that Russian officials have gone to in order to bury the truth, hide evidence, and stifle public debate. If they had a real case to try, none of this would be necessary. The arbitrary arrests of both Yuri Schmidt and Karinna Moskalenko coming into and leaving Chita, simply to do their job of defending their client, are largely symbolic of the fraud and deception that has come to characterize the Russian procuracy. As someone who has worked under this environment of intimidation and hostility toward lawyers, I strongly urge all those in the legal sector reading these words to contact every professional organization of which they are members to denounce this unacceptable conduct, and demand security and fair treatment toward all lawyers working on politically sensitive cases in Russia. - Robert Amsterdam
White Papers
- The Bangkok Massacres – A Call for Accountability
- White Paper on Nigeria's Nasir El-Rufai
- The Repression of Political Freedoms in Singapore: The Case of Opposition Leader Dr. Chee Soon Juan
- Bolivarian Rule of Lawlessness: A White Paper on Venezuela's Political Prisoners
- White Paper: Abuse of State Authority in the Russian Federation
Latest Thailand Blog Stories- Does Thailand Want Democracy? February 9, 2012
- Video: Pravit Rojanaphruk Interviews Robert Amsterdam February 5, 2012
- Abhisit and Free Speech: Never the Twain Shall Meet February 5, 2012
- Thailand Gets Improved Marks on Human Rights February 1, 2012
- RA’s Thailand News Blast – Jan 31, 2012 January 31, 2012
Latest Czech Blog Stories- Když státníci šílí February 10, 2012
- Jízda začíná February 10, 2012
- Když vyšetřovatelé prchají od velké korupční kauzy February 10, 2012
- Přímo!!! February 9, 2012
- Vyvlastnit vlastnictví February 9, 2012
Latest CFP Blog Stories- Franz Sedelmayer: Leading the Fight Against Sovereign Immunity February 1, 2012
- Zimbabwe – The Pillar of Education and Fostering a Patriotism That Never Seemed to Waver January 25, 2012
- Quality Assurance: Brazil Probes Chinese Mobile Phone Imports January 11, 2012
- “Unquantifiable Risk” for Anglo in Chile January 4, 2012
- Shell Faces New Risks in Nigeria January 4, 2012
2 Comments
Dear Mr. AmsterdamYou write: Given this fundamental disregard for an individual’s right to properly defend himself, I believe the conduct of the procuracy of the Russian Federation in this case can be compared to that of an organized criminal group, one whose activities should be condemned by every prosecutorial organization that attempts to uphold the rule of law.Hmmm … if you are so interested in those whose individual right to properly defend themselves is disregarded, why don’t you go to Guantanamo and take care of the unlucky Muslims there ?Is it (a) because they are Muslims and not Jewish ?Is it (b) because they are not held in Russia ?Is it (c) because you won’t receive any more standing ovations by ‘La Russophobe’ any more who is so proud to have been cited on your blog and to listed on your blogroll ?Or is it (d) because those individuals in Guantanamo aren’t billionaires and most likely can’t afford your assistance ? No real PR to win in Guantanamo ?No, offense intended. I am just curious.
My apologies for the delayed response to your comment. Of course I am deeply concerned about the situation at Guantanamo, and follow these events very carefully. In fact, next month I will be publishing a co-authored academic paper on the Dual State and Russia in the Fordham International Law Journal along with my friend and colleague Alex Knoops, who provided the expert testimony before the Supreme Court on the historic Hamdan Case.We do highly political cases outside of Russia, including Guatemala, Venezuela, and most recently, Rwanda, and quite frankly, my life has often been guided by the people who seek out my assistance. As of yet, no major Muslim figure has sought out my help, but I certainly remain open to discussing any opportunity to defend any client who is facing an environment lacking in rule of law.