A Lack of Trust in Russia

What’s behind the Kremlin’s deep-seated suspicion of the West? The BBC’s Rupert Wingfield Hayes takes a trip to Russia and finds himself quite unwelcome, and also quite unable to find his way around. His column is annoyingly anti-Russian, which always drives me crazy, but is extrapolated largely from the hard facts of how the UK-Russia relationship has so disastrously deteriorated. BBC: “Speaking afterwards one of his colleagues put it to me this way: “In the 1990s we had an opportunity to turn Russia outwards towards the West. But we failed. Now it’s gone, and it won’t be back for at least a generation.”

From the BBC:

Russia’s deep suspicion of the WestRupert Wingfield Hayes reports on Russia’s view of the outside world after its foreign minister accuses Britain of deliberately sabotaging relations with Moscow.Living in Moscow, you often get the feeling Russia would really prefer it if the rest of the world just went away and left Russia alone.Take Moscow itself for example. It is Russia’s biggest, most developed and most cosmopolitan city.But if you can’t read the Cyrillic alphabet getting around is almost impossible.Only in the last year has the immigration department finally relented and starting printing immigration cards in English.Before that foreign tourists arriving at Moscow’s ghastly Sheremetyevo airport could be seen scratching their heads and muttering things like: “What the hell does this mean?”Lack of trustAnd it is not just tourists that find it hard.I was recently chatting to the manager of a large Scandinavian company that is investing hundreds of millions of pounds in Russia. I asked him how his company was treated by the authorities.”Well, it’s not so easy,” he said with a grin and a shrug. “You often get the feeling they don’t really want us here.”"That’s extraordinary,” I said. “You are bringing investment and jobs and technology to Russia.”"Yes,” he agreed.Russia’s attitude to the outside world could be summed up as: “We don’t trust you” and, “Thank you, but we can do it ourselves.”Deep suspicionTake the announcement this week that almost all the British Council’s offices in Russia are to be closed.In the 1990s Britain spent millions of pounds setting up 15 British Council centres across Russia.They established English teaching programmes, set up libraries, helped local schools improve their language teaching, and gave out scholarships to study in Britain.It was part of a grand post-Soviet plan to engage Russia, to pull it out of its isolation and into the Western sphere.But from the outset the British Council was viewed by the authorities with deep suspicion.The KGB, or FSB as it had now become, clearly saw it as a front for British spying. In other words: “We don’t trust you.”Teenage zealotsIn the last few weeks Russian suspicion of the outside world seems to have reached a new level of hysteria.The day after Russia’s parliamentary elections last week we awoke to find thousands of fanatical young Putin supporters patrolling the streets of Moscow.They had been told by their Kremlin masters to take control of “key buildings” to prevent any attempt at a political take-over by “foreign-backed groups”.Among the buildings targeted for special attention were the British Embassy and the BBC bureau.When I went outside to ask them why they were picketing us, the group of callow youths were hard put to come up with an answer.”We are here to make sure no-one tries to steal our victory,” one young woman tried.Her comrades looked sullen and cold. I felt sorry for them.I wondered if they really believed their own rhetoric. Where was all this paranoia coming from?Inferiority complexIt just so happens that the day Russia ordered the British Council offices to close down this week, I was sitting down inside the massive granite edifice that is the Russian foreign ministry, to interview Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.Mr Lavrov is tall and urbane. He speaks beautiful English, French, and according to his biography, Sinhalese, which he learned while posted to Sri Lanka in the 1970s.He spent more than 15 years living in New York. Surely no xenophobe he.Russia is in a deep funk about its position in the world. It is a huge country with an equally large inferiority complex.But to hear Mr Lavrov you would think the Cold War had never ended.He described a world in which America is seeking to contain Russia.He said Russia had watched as America has pushed the borders of Nato ever further eastwards, swallowing up Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania. Next it will be Georgia.He described Washington’s plans to build missile bases in Poland and the Czech Republic as part of a network of new missile bases from Alaska to Japan, all designed to encircle Russia.Blame gameWhat is clear is that Russia is in a deep funk about its position in the world. It is a huge country with an equally large inferiority complex.In the 1990s it lost an empire, and with it, the respect and prestige it feels it deserves.It blames the West and particularly America and Britain.Last week Andrei Lugovoi, the man wanted in Britain for the poisoning murder of Alexander Litvinienko, was elected to parliament as an ultra-nationalist MP.At the time the sole surviving MP from Russia’s pro-Western liberal parties lost his seat in parliament.Speaking afterwards one of his colleagues put it to me this way: “In the 1990s we had an opportunity to turn Russia outwards towards the West. But we failed. Now it’s gone, and it won’t be back for at least a generation.”

. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

3 Comments

  1. Posted December 16, 2007 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

    I don’t find it anti-Russian, I think it’s quite clearly anti-Russian-policy, specifically the policy of shutting down the British Council. That’s an unprovoked act of cold war aimed directly at the culture of the British people, and they’re entitled to take it personally.Nobody can dispute that Russians give foreigners a clear impression they aren’t wanted in Russia. I’m actually a bit disappointed that the column didn’t go further in calling the people of Russia to account for the actions of their government. Without such efforts, we will never see the people of Russia demand a course change because they will never wake up and realize the horror their Putindream is wrecking on their future.

  2. tommo.1
    Posted December 17, 2007 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    Russia is not anti-foreign at all, but there are some lingering, outdated views of what patriotism is, and these views do not translate from government to the man in the street.On patriotism, a Russian distributor once explained that he continued to sell an old, failing, unpopular, brand to show he was patriotic. He provided the brand, but consumers universally ignored it, preferring instead to buy products from Procter and Gamble, Unilever and Henkel – hardly Russian companies (albeit major employers). The same is true in almost any consumer market where consumers have the choice.Likewise, many employees having been fired, rehired, unpaid and generally abused by Russian employers, wish to work in the stability of a western company where they will be paid ‘white’, managed professionally, and treated like grown ups.The journalist, in common with many others, makes a mistake by equating the conversations he has with well educated members of a government / bureaucratic elite with the concerns and actions of millions when they have a choice. Moreoever, let’s not forget that this elite is still very happy to educate its children in the UK / US, go skiing in Switzerland, and buy property in Spain.Geopolitics and government policy are not the same as possessing a real and active dislike of the west.

  3. Posted December 17, 2007 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    TOMMO:Your comments seem to come from another planet. You say that the mass public doesn’t hate the west, then seek to “prove” it by saying the elite educate their kids in the West. Then you say that elite hostility to the West doesn’t speak for the mass public. It’s sheer nonsense.Russia is providing arms to Venezuela, nukes to Iran, and cash to Hezbollah/Hamas. These are the West’s most hated foes, it’s no different than the West supporting Shamil Basaev. And there isn’t even a little bit of mainstream opposition to these actions either in the Duma or on TV or in the press.I wish you bon voyage on your little boat trip down the longest river in psychology: Denial.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>