Several stories in the US press today have focused on Dmitry Medvedev. The Wall Street Journal has compiled a series of extracts translated from Medvedev’s campaign appearance in Nizhny Novgorod, together with soundbites from past interviews and speeches. These include a comment made at the World Economic Forum in January 2007 which exemplifies the thus far very balanced approach we have seen from Medvedev that has caused journalists to cautiously view him as a potentially reasonable and neutralizing voice for Russia. “We are not trying to make anyone love Russia, but we will also not allow anyone to do Russia harm. What we want is respect towards Russia’s people and our country as a whole, but we will obtain this respect through responsible behavior and through our achievements, and not through force.”
Another set of excerpts has been compiled at the New York Times. The paper also features a slideshow of Medvedev’s recent trip to a Russian Infantry Division. Another New York Times article, subsequently picked up by the Chicago Tribune, tries to get underneath the outward impression created by Medvedev’s balanced style. The author suggests that he is “creating his own public identity according to a choreographed script,” and focusing on the difference in style between Putin and Medvedev. He ventures that Medvedev has struck a “campy pose” for the press. Many analysts, he notes, are quick to differentiate between style and content. “That’s public relations. That’s not strategic shift,” one is quoted as saying.PHOTO: James Hill for The New York Times
White Papers
- The Bangkok Massacres – A Call for Accountability
- White Paper on Nigeria's Nasir El-Rufai
- The Repression of Political Freedoms in Singapore: The Case of Opposition Leader Dr. Chee Soon Juan
- Bolivarian Rule of Lawlessness: A White Paper on Venezuela's Political Prisoners
- White Paper: Abuse of State Authority in the Russian Federation
Latest Thailand Blog Stories- Does Thailand Want Democracy? February 9, 2012
- Video: Pravit Rojanaphruk Interviews Robert Amsterdam February 5, 2012
- Abhisit and Free Speech: Never the Twain Shall Meet February 5, 2012
- Thailand Gets Improved Marks on Human Rights February 1, 2012
- RA’s Thailand News Blast – Jan 31, 2012 January 31, 2012
Latest Czech Blog Stories- Když státníci šílí February 10, 2012
- Jízda začíná February 10, 2012
- Když vyšetřovatelé prchají od velké korupční kauzy February 10, 2012
- Přímo!!! February 9, 2012
- Vyvlastnit vlastnictví February 9, 2012
Latest CFP Blog Stories- Franz Sedelmayer: Leading the Fight Against Sovereign Immunity February 1, 2012
- Zimbabwe – The Pillar of Education and Fostering a Patriotism That Never Seemed to Waver January 25, 2012
- Quality Assurance: Brazil Probes Chinese Mobile Phone Imports January 11, 2012
- “Unquantifiable Risk” for Anglo in Chile January 4, 2012
- Shell Faces New Risks in Nigeria January 4, 2012
One Comment
“We are not trying to make anyone love Russia, but we will also not allow anyone to do Russia harm. What we want is respect towards Russia’s people and our country as a whole, but we will obtain this respect through responsible behavior and through our achievements, and not through force.”This is a man of imponderable ignorance. If he really believed what he said, he would refuse to participate in the sham elections that will make him “president” while denigrating the very definition of “responsible behavior.”His suggestion that Russia COULD act by force is even more nonsensical, as it is utterly and hopelessly outmanned, out-monied and out-gunned by NATO.His every action and every word undermines the world’s respect for Russia, and makes it a laughing stock.