An article by Peter Finn in yesterday’s Washington Post makes an interesting point about Yelena Valyavina’s surprising confession in late May about Kremlin interference in the courts: now we’re at least allowed to talk about rule of law and legal reform in Russia, which some are taking as an optimistic sign of the new Medvedev era. As Finn writes in his article, the fact that Valyavina’s boss, Anton Ivanov, is one of Medvedev’s closest supporters is “not lost on anyone,” and given that there is zero disagreement between Putin and Medvedev on foreign affairs or security issues, legal reform could be his “instrument” to build his own individual popularity and support, playing to the popular discontent with the corrupt and inefficient courts. It’s an interesting theory, accompanied by both supportive and damaging evidence.
All eyes are on Olga Yegorova, one of the justices famous for interfering in the Yukos case and turning the Moscow City Court in a Kremlin appendage, who is reported to be increasingly marginalized (more than 80 judges have resigned in protest since Yegorova’s appointment by presidential decree). We also saw that Manana Aslamazyan picked up an extremely rare fair ruling in her case, as the state backed off on the persecution of her and her group, Educated Media Foundation (although arguably the civil society body is now destroyed).But then, on the other hand, we have the legal eyesore of TNK-BP, which although is not exactly experiencing the same type of state attack as Yukos, Royal Dutch Shell, or even Russneft, it is still a clear and embarrassing case of Russia’s failing legal system to protect basic property and shareholder rights. Although what is surprising about the TNK-BP fiasco is how seriously the new Kremlin leadership is reacting to the image problem: First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov exposed his desperation to cover up the problem, and reassure investors of basic legal protections. “We have to repeat again and again — protection of property rights is the top and most important task of the state,” Shuvalov said.Yes indeed, Minister Shuvalov, wouldn’t it be great if you didn’t always have to repeat that?
Latest Thailand Blog Stories- Thai PM Yingluck aims to strengthen Thai democracy April 29, 2013
- Reversing Thai Democracy – the Imprisonment of Korkaew Pikulthong April 27, 2013
- Justice for the Dead of Kok Wua April 9, 2013
- IPU Issues Historic Resolution on Thailand April 2, 2013
- Political Prisoners and Thailand’s Deep State January 12, 2013
Latest Zambia Blog Updates- Guy Scott: Wrong on Rights
- Zambia’s Pursuit of Henry Banda Proven False by Interpol Case Dismissal, Says Lawyer Robert Amsterdam
- PF’s Excuse for Blocking Banda’s Travel is Contemptible, Says Amsterdam
- Breakdown in Rule of Law as Zambian Authorities Illegally Prevent former President Banda from Travel to Kenya
- Former President Banda’s Immunity Removed to Clear Way for Sata’s Successor, Says Lawyer
Latest CFP Blog Stories- Boko Haram and the Case For Amnesty April 12, 2013
- You Can’t Hack a Steakhouse – What China Doesn’t Get About How Washington Works. February 28, 2013
- The 2013 Resource Nationalism Checklist January 9, 2013
- Russia’s Sticky Stagnation December 28, 2012
- Minimizing Political Risk in Frontier Markets December 17, 2012
White Papers
- The Bangkok Massacres – A Call for Accountability
- White Paper on Nigeria's Nasir El-Rufai
- The Repression of Political Freedoms in Singapore: The Case of Opposition Leader Dr. Chee Soon Juan
- Bolivarian Rule of Lawlessness: A White Paper on Venezuela's Political Prisoners
- White Paper: Abuse of State Authority in the Russian Federation
One Comment
I fail to see what need Medvedev has for “individual popularity” based on personal accomplishments when he has just been elected in a landslide in the absence of them.He does, of course, have use for a smokescreen of ridiculous lies which he can use to build leverage against the West, undercutting its impetus to confront neo-Soviet Russia.