Today there was a notable exchange between PM Vladimir Putin and EU Commission President José Manuel Barroso, when the latter raised his concerns over the murder of Stanislav Markelov and other notable human rights abuses occurring in Russia.
In my opinion, it was about time that Europe woke up to the fact that it is not OK, it is not normal for the leadership of any country to say nothing about the assassinations of human rights lawyers in broad daylight on the sidewalks on their capital. We can only hope that this is the beginning of a new dialogue and a greater interest in the plight of the Kremlin’s victims, and not the last word.
Putin, however, had one of his Kursk moments, and briefly lost his temper with a person he is said to regard as a mere European bureaucrat. What made Putin the most angry was the fact that Medvedev was not present to take the blame. This is, as far as I know, the first time we have seen how disturbed and panicked the Kremlin is over the murder of Markelov. From what we know from media reports, the only other names which raise a similar reaction are “Mikhail Khodorkovsky” and “Anna Politkovskaya.”
From the Financial Times:
In a press conference during a visit to Moscow on Friday he sparredwith the Russian prime minister, a sign that relations between Russiaand the EU remain tense following the January gas crisis which leftlarge parts of Europe without heat for days.
“Europeanpublic opinion remains concerned about the recent events in Russia,such as the murder of journalists and human rights workers,” said MrBarroso.
That provoked an angry response from Mr Putin, whochastised Mr Barroso for making his criticisms without Russia’spresident Dmitry Medvedev in the room. “Mr Barroso had his discussionin the Kremlin, and made his announcement here, where PresidentMedvedev is not present and cannot give his side on this question” saida visibly furious Mr Putin.
There was more on the incident from the Moscow Times, about Putin’s reaction to Barroso’s criticism by pointing to the mistreatment of ethnic Russians in Baltic states:
A visibly irritated Putin responded by saying that Europe should nottalk down to Russia and accused the EU of violating the rights ofethnic Russian minorities, immigrants and prisoners.
“We are not satisfied how the issue of Russian-speakingpopulations in the Baltics continues to be solved,” Putin said. “Weknow about the rights of immigrants in European countries and how theyare violated. We know about the situation in the penal systems in someEuropean countries, and we have the same kinds of problems.
“We believe in the need to discuss the entire spectrum of problems in Russia and in EU countries,” Putin said.
In an emotional reaction, Barroso said he had informed Medvedevabout the “concern” that the recent murders of “some journalists andsome human rights activists” have prompted in Europe. (…)Barroso went on to give an impassioned speech, saying people weremore important that diplomatic protocols and insisting that Europe isopen to criticism.
“We don’t pretend to be perfect,” Barroso said. “We accept criticism.”
When Barroso finished, Putin suggested — first through atranslator and then in English — to end the discussion, after which thetwo proceeded to address the importance of bilateral ties.
Photo: EU Commision President Manuel Barroso (L) and Russian Prime Minister Vladimir PutinReuters Pictures)address reporters in Moscow February 6, 2009. The European Union metRussia on Friday for their first high-level talks since a price disputebetween Moscow and Ukraine led to the most serious disruption toEuropean gas supplies for years.(
2 Comments
One can only wonder how much more unhinged “Prime Minister” Putin would have become if Mr. Barroso had found the courage to actually speak Markelov’s name! Maybe Putin’s head would have exploded. Or maybe, in the foyer of his apartment building, Barroso’s.
Mr.BarrosoMy name is Solomon Weldu Kidane from AMSTERDAM. I am calling to request that you to oppose in the strongest language possible the draft resolution in the U.N.Security Council to impose sanctions against Eritrea based on fabricated information. A careful look will show you that those responsible for the problems in Somalia are those that have historical antagonism with Somalia NOT Eritrea.I am in support of the Presidents policy of constructive engagement, reconciliation and partnership with the rest of the world.Sadly, the U.S. UN team is talking about sanctions against Eritrea oncharges repeatedly proven to be groundless.Why talk of sanctions instead of engagement; why threats instead of reconciliation and why punishments instead of partnerships?The UN Security Council and State Department must exercise a fair and justpractice in evaluating all the facts and evidence to find a lasting peace in the Horn of Africa and should not be swayed by those that have an axe togrind against Eritrea; the lives of innocent people are at stake.Mr. BarrosoWhy would you harm the people of Eritrea ? Why don t you ask the people behind this malicious scheme to come forward and present the evidence ?Is that not strange and unjust to condemn someone without that he is proven guilty ? This is simply not expected from Mr. Barroso..As a young representative of EU I would expect from you that you say NO to injustice, Lobby-influenced-policy and dishonest judgment.Would you as a young Ambassador to the EU allow some Lobbyist of some Country to BUY a Law ? and use it against a Country that is not proven guilty ?Mr.BarrosoSTOP THIS SANCTION DON’T LET THE PEOPLE OF ERITREA SUFFER AGAINAS U SURELY ARE AWARE THIS PEOPLE SUFFERED FOR 30 YEARS LONG BECAUSE OF THESAME UNJUSTICE THAT YOU ARE GOING TO APPROVE.HISTORY, GOD AND THE PEOPLE OF ERITREA WILL REMEMBER YOUR JUDJEMENT.Looking forward for your judgment.Please accept my highest regardsSolomon Weldu KidaneAmsterdam 22/12/2009