Below is an excerpt of a frightening, slightly exaggerated, but not entirely untrue opinion article in The Weekly Standard about the Moldova protests by Stephen Schwartz.
The new election of an outright Communist government was bound to stimulate discontent among Moldovan youth, who have never known the harsh realities of Slavic rule. But once again, in Eastern Europe the long-established historical paradigm defines reality. With apparent contempt for the flirtation with Moscow offered by the Obama administration, Putin and his gang are bent on firming up control over their former possessions and neighbors. A Communist regime in Moldova was merely a step, according to regional critics of Putin â s intentions, toward a long-expected assault on independent Ukraine. And it was probably no coincidence that the upheaval in Moldova paralleled Moscow’s assertion that Chechnya has been pacified. Chechnya borders Georgia, and many observers believe that Putin is preparing another attack on the latter country, later this year, perhaps crossing the Chechen area. (…)
In the frontline of opposition to revived Russian aggression,Poland, Ukraine, Georgia, and Kosovo are key players, inhabited bypeoples who despise Putin and are also ready to fight for the freedomsthey have gained in the past 20 years. Is Moldova worth Americanengagement? Probably not. But the likelihood that President Obama willabandon our commitment to place missile defense facilities in Polandand the Czech Republic would send the worst possible message to Moscow.Russian expansionism has gained new life, regardless of the blows ofthe global economic crisis. It can no more be ameliorated by diplomacythan can the threat of Iran and other extreme Islamist enemies ofdemocracy, or the radical leftist upsurge in Latin America.
Let us hope that future historians do not look back at the events inMoldova and judge that obliviousness about such remote issues led us tonew and worse appeasement. In the case of Moldova, we need to know nowwhat Putin and his co-conspirators, including those in Serbia, intend,and to prepare for committed opposition to their brutal adventurism.
Photo: A man holds a newspaper with a photo of Tuesday’s clashes during anopposition rally in Chisinau on April 12, 2009. About 10,000 peoplerallied in Moldova today against President Vladimir Voronin‘s “dictatorial” leadership as the constitutional court ordered a recount of disputed legislative elections. (Getty Images)
Subscribe by Email
One Comment
” A Communist regime in Moldova was merely a step, according to regional critics of Putin â s intentions, toward a long-expected assault on independent Ukraine. And it was probably no coincidence that the upheaval in Moldova paralleled Moscow’s assertion that Chechnya has been pacified.”I guess , imho , you are totally false !Moldova is a convenient ” buffer state ” between a ” Great Romania ” [ Which comprises in some drea...projects Odessa ] and Ukraine . I don’t think the Ukrainian leadership is pleased to see the Romanian govt issueing passports to Moldovans .It’s a kind of practise dangerous in this region …….Because after the Moldovan issue , there is the Bucovina issue . And i am not so sure that the SBU is pleased to see Romanian Orthodox churches musheromming in Bucovina with black money raised among the Romanian diaspora and provided throught Romanian agencies .It appears also that Transnistria becomes a guarantee for Ukraine rather than a threat : If Bucharest seems not afraid to attack Kyiv in his backyard , it will look closer when it will have to deal with the Russian bear .This factors explains perhaps why the ” western world ” is so reluctant to sponsor this new ” revolution .Good old geopolitical laws explain things better than crude Russophobia .