Kim Dotcom and the Redefinition of American Corruption

Kim-Dotcom-Robert-AmsterdamThis week I am here in New Zealand where we have announced my joining the legal team of Kim Dotcom, focusing on issues of international law and human rights.  On Jan. 20, I had the privilege of participating in the wild launch event for Mega, Dotcom’s newest encrypted cloud storage service.  The launch took place on the same day as an unlawful FBI-directed raid on his home and the seizure of his former company, Megaupload, one year earlier.

For those of you who haven’t followed the case, the raid on Kim’s home, his subsequent detention, seizure of assets, and destruction of his business by prosecutors from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has represented one of the most flagrant abuses of power in recent memory.  The case is quickly becoming one of the textbook examples of excessive over-reaching by governments to control the Internet through copyright extremism.

The prosecution’s case is essentially bogus.  Kim’s lawyer Ira Rothken has picked apart the allegations in a number of interviews, exposing the flaws in every point of the indictment.  As an Internet services intermediary, Megaupload diligently complied with takedown requests to remove infringing materials, and went even further to allow some 180 content-producing companies direct access to the servers to delete infringing materials themselves, which was unprecedented for any cloud storage provider.  Despite never once having been sued by any movie studio or record company, the DOJ wants to hold Megaupload liable for infringement via third party cases of piracy by users – however there exists no federal criminal statute for secondary copyright infringement, so essentially they are trying to unlawfully apply civil law in a criminal law context.  As Rothken has argued, the aggressive persecution of Kim Dotcom and other Megaupload founders has been full of “dirty tactics” by U.S. prosecutors.

The case is particularly interesting to me given my usual work in countries facing serious issues of prosecutorial independence.  But here we have two of the most advanced legal systems in the United States and New Zealand, and yet their prosecutors and police are behaving in a manner not often seen in rule of law countries.

These prosecutors and law enforcement authorities conducted a reckless armed raid on his home, featuring some 70 rifle-toting commandos knowingly invading a dwelling with children, a pregnant wife, and zero threat of violence.  The raid was preceded by unlawful spying and Orwellian violations of privacy against Kim that should make every free citizen concerned about the willingness of these governments to violate the law.  The media was tipped to this theatrical show of force ahead of time, apparently in an attempt to taint the reputations of the accused and violate their right to the presumption of innocence.

You cannot help but feel that there must be some explanation for this conduct that transcends the concept of prosecutorial independence.  Adding to these questionable justifications for the use of force on foreign soil, the case is being backed by a prosecutor who formerly worked for the Business Software Alliance on anti-piracy issues.  There are also legitimate concerns about the role of former Sen. Chris Dodd, chairman of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), whom Vice President Joe Biden describes as “one of his best friends.

During the Mega launch party, Kim disclosed some interesting facts that should raise questions about the political motives behind the raid and seizures.  Having monitored all their emails, prosecutors were fully aware that he was going to be in the United States just a few months later on vacation.  The tickets were booked, the house rented, so the federal authorities knew full well they had the opportunity to conduct their raid on U.S. soil to avoid any extradition issues.  If this were a real criminal investigation instead of a contract prosecution, why wouldn’t they just wait?

What’s interesting is that on Jan. 19, 2011, on behalf of the Hollywood lobby, former Sen. Dodd issued a threat to the Democrat Party and the reelection campaign of President Barack Obama, saying that the movie studios may withhold campaign funding if they didn’t see an immediate show of action.  “Don’t ask me to write a check for you when you think your job is at risk and then don’t pay any attention to me when my job is at stake,” Dodd said.

Ever since the New Zealand raid one year ago, Kim and his partners have been vindicated by many court decisions.  The warrants used to raid the property were found to be deficient.  The Prime Minister of New Zealand has had to publicly apologize to Kim and his family for the illegal spying that took place at the behest of the United States.  Canada has refused to hand over server data requested by the United States, while a German court has refused to execute a seizure of assets based on insufficient evidence.

This case highlights not only the issue of “state capture” by the Hollywood lobby, but at the same time should lead to a thoughtful discussion on how we define corruption.  No one would venture to allege that there is any form of cash payment taking place when official bodies appear to act at the behest of special interests motives.  Because that’s not how these groups work.

It is a demonstration of the growing ambiguity of the lines between regulators and the regulated, and the proper role of intellectual property in the digital age.  As we’ve seen in the sad and tragic case of Aaron Swartz, for whom Prosecutor Carmen Ortiz was seeking 13 criminal charges and more than 50 years in jail, the American justice system is increasingly flawed by this prosecutorial exuberance aimed at future political reward.

It is one thing when the victims of these abuses are American citizens, who live at the whim of an unaccountable prosecutorial machine driven by personal political ambitions and an appetite for headlines.  It is something else entirely when these prosecutors visit their ambitions upon foreign citizens, charging them with heinous crimes with no basis under law, even if that person has never once set foot inside the United States (like Kim Dotcom).

With this attempt to “colonize” the global internet under U.S. laws, Washington is quickly making a bad name for itself, and putting its considerable influence on the wrong side of digital rights, free markets, and competitive innovation.  They do this in the name of protecting a broken business model, subsidizing monopolies, and seeking to destroy crucial online functions instead of adapting to the incredible opportunity afforded to them through mass connectivity.  We deserve better, we can do better, and everyone can benefit from a more reasonable approach focused on the best interests of the public, not the best interests of lobbyists and the politicians in their pockets.

We see this as a grand ideological debate with far-reaching implications, and sadly, my lengthy experience in countries where special interests control the levers of power may have some utility here.

. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Posted January 27, 2013 at 4:03 am | Permalink

    Very disappointed that you have taken up the defense of Dotcom. It undermines your defense of Khodorkovsky and furthers the thuggish cause of the copyleftists.

    • Drew
      Posted January 29, 2013 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

      How much are they paying you to spread their majorly flawed propaganda? I have a question have you ever loaned anything out to anyone in your entire life? It’s human nature to share and no amount of laws will change that. Letting a friend stream a movie of yours is no different from loaning a hammer to your next door neighbor.

      If you did not loan it they would have been forced to go out and buy one of their own. You can spin it all you like and try to say it is different but why lie to yourself?

      Megaupload removed pirated files faster than most of the file host that exist. He gave copyright holders access to actually remove infringing files themselves. They don’t talk about that too much though. This was a them throwing a fit over losing SOPA/PIPA it happened directly after they were shot down.

      I read your post which was a great comedy piece.

  2. Roland
    Posted January 29, 2013 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

    @Catherine: very disappointed you have abandoned the rule of law in order to defend special interests. Can’t you read? The URL you posted is an ad hominem attack on OpenSource and the EFF. Why don’t you attack puppies while you’re at it?

    “…prosecutors visit their ambitions upon foreign citizens, charging them with heinous crimes with no basis under law, even if that person has never once set foot inside the United States.” This isn’t the first time they’ve done this. Marc Emery sold cannabis seeds thru the mail from BC (where it was legal) but the Canadian govt sold him out to US prosecutors for it.

  3. Mr. X
    Posted February 2, 2013 at 5:16 am | Permalink

    I see my comments about Pirrong’s prior record of Russophobic fanaticism and hatred for Ron Paul in comparing him to the genocidal Khmer Rouge have been cut. As have my comments about his absurd wimpishness on the MF Global theft within his own commodities industry and the like. Such coddled people, that SWP hive, what with Twitter keeping anyone from uttering a peep about them, and now Amsterdam too. As such I won’t post a comment here anymore.

  4. Posted March 1, 2013 at 8:39 pm | Permalink

    Quality articles or reviews is the important to be a focus for the visitors to visit the site,
    that’s what this web page is providing.

  5. Posted March 9, 2013 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    Sweet blog! I found it while browsing on Yahoo News.
    Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News?
    I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thanks

  6. Posted March 11, 2013 at 4:07 am | Permalink

    Wonderful article! This is the kind of information
    that should be shared around the internet. Disgrace on the seek engines for now not positioning this put up higher!
    Come on over and talk over with my web site .
    Thank you =)

  7. Posted April 17, 2013 at 5:48 am | Permalink

    This web site truly has all the information I wanted concerning this
    subject and didn’t know who to ask.

  8. Posted May 5, 2013 at 1:33 am | Permalink

    I used to be suggested this website via my cousin.
    I am now not sure whether or not this submit is written by way of him as no
    one else know such specific about my difficulty. You are
    wonderful! Thanks!

2 Trackbacks

  1. […] Source: Robert Amsterdam […]

  2. […] I was therefore extremely dismayed to see that he has joined the Kim Dotcom legal defense.  Amsterdam offers several justifications for this choice.  First, that the prosecution is “essentially bogus.”  Second, that the US government, with the complicity of the government of New Zealand, utilized excessive force in arresting Dotcom.  Third, that the US government took this action for crass political reason, namely, to retain the political and financial support of the motion picture industry. […]