Sarah Palin’s Russia Inexperience

I’ve kept mostly mum about Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin’s ongoing claims of being an expert on Russia affairs because 1) so many others out there are doing a pretty good job tearing this narrative to shreds, and 2) because it is simply a patently ridiculous claim that any given Alaska politician automatically gets to put on the Kremlinologist hat whenever necessary (furthermore I wouldn’t say that many governors of Texas are exactly high regarded for their knowledge of Mexican foreign policy issues). I think it’s quite an innocent line for the campaign to push – what candidate for office doesn’t trump up every experience that they can point to? But what’s interesting here is that they are still clinging to the Palin-as-Russia-expert line despite all the open derision, and continuing to push the argument despite clear evidence that nobody is buying it. This one comes from the CBS From the Road blog:

On a clear day, it is, in fact, possible to see the unpopulated Russian island of Big Diomede from the Alaskan island of Little Diomede, which is inhabited by a small native population. Still, Palin’s hometown of Wasilla isn’t much closer to the Russian capital of Moscow (4,318 miles) than New York City is (4,663 miles). But rather than downplaying Palin’s suggestion that she possesses special knowledge of Russia, the McCain/Palin campaign has continued to tout Alaska’s proximity to the world’s largest nation as a feather in her cap, without offering any evidence of actual experience Palin has in Russian affairs.

Asked to provide concrete examples of Palin’s foreign policy experience, Palin spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt highlighted the governor’s dealings on energy issues and foreign trade and mentioned the 2007 trip she took to visit U.S. troops in the Middle East and Germany.Schmitt added, “She is Governor of the only state with two international borders – a land border with Canada and a maritime border with Russia.”CBS News made several inquiries over the course of two days to another campaign spokesperson asking for details on any practical experience Palin had with Russia. The spokesperson said that campaign staffers were gathering evidence related to trade issues, but no such information was disseminated.A spokesperson at the governor’s office in Juneau directed all inquiries to the McCain/Palin campaign. Told that the inquiry was related to Palin’s role as the governor of Alaska – not as a vice presidential candidate – the spokesperson said that state ethics legislation required that all questions “fueled by the governor’s candidacy” must be directed to the campaign. The spokesperson provided a phone number for a campaign spokeswoman Meg Stapleton. A phone message left on Stapleton’s voicemail was not returned.In the ABC interview Palin was asked in the event that Georgia joined the NATO alliance and was subsequently attacked by Russia, whether the United States would have to go to war with Russia.“Perhaps so,” Palin said. “I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if another country is attacked, you’re going to be expected to be called upon and help.”Dr. Charles Kupchan, a Georgetown University professor of international relations and senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, agreed that NATO would have little choice in such a case.“The spirit of Article Five is an attack on one is an attack on all, and as a result of that, there is a presumption that if Georgia were a NATO member, or if any other NATO member would attack, that the alliance would invoke Article Five and come to its defense,” Kupchan said. “NATO could decide in a certain circumstance that it was not going to respond militarily, but that would obviously call into question NATO’s credibility in its commitment to collective defense.”In a statement issued last month, Democratic nominee Barack Obama said, “I have consistently called for deepening relations between Georgia and transatlantic institutions, including a Membership Action Plan for NATO, and we must continue to press for that deeper relationship.”Aside from the ABC interview, Palin herself has not continued to tout Alaska’s proximity to Russia as an example of her foreign policy knowledge. Instead, she often mentions on the campaign trail her work in striking a deal to construct a nearly $40 billion natural gas pipeline from Alaska, which would lead through Canada into the continental United States, as evidence that she has been at the forefront of making the U.S. energy independent.“In general, the main way governors get involved in foreign countries is economic – they try to get countries to invest and go on trade missions, but very rarely do they get involved in issues of national security, in part because the Constitution prevents them from doing so,” Kupchan said.“I think its fair to say [Palin’s] exposure to most foreign policy issues is minimal. Had she been a governor for a long time and gotten involved in politics on the broader national stage, that would be different.”Asked what foreign policy credentials Palin might bring with her to Washington, Dr. Gerald McBeath, the political science department chair at the University of Alaska – Fairbanks, pointed to Alaska’s military bases and said that Palin would certainly be aware of security operations surrounding them.“It used to be more critical in the Cold War than it is now,” McBeath added.McBeath also noted that Alaska is within striking range of missiles that could be launched from North Korea.A senior campaign aide who agreed to speak on the condition of anonymity admitted that Palin’s knowledge of Russia may be limited to the way someone from Miami might obtain a general feel for Latin America.“It is very much being able to look off the tip of Alaska,” the aide said. “Metaphorically, I’m talking about.”