It is rational and logical for some governments to declare certain sectors of the economy as sensitive to national security, and therefore requiring some type of overview process before allowing foreign ownership and management – defense and utilities, for example.  However in Russia, when a sector is declared as “strategic,” and therefore vulnerable to arbitrary state interference, this brings an entirely different set of concerns to the equation for any foreign investors.  The Kremlin is far from unique in using strategic sector designations as a blunt instrument of protectionism – just look back at the ridiculous Dubai Ports World controversy, or even repeated attempts by the Spanish and French to block energy mergers – but they may be unique in their reputation for abuse of these regulatory privileges for private and personal gain.

But in these days of crisis, the designation of strategic enterprises is more meaningful in terms of receiving state subsidies than the restriction on foreign investment and shareholdings.  Today Reuters reports (see below) on the announcement of Russia’s list for 2009.  The winners:  Gazprom, Rosneft, Aeroflot (who knows if this means Lebedev can hang on), Norilsk Nickel (same goes for the beleaguered Deripaska), and Vimpelcom.  The losers:  Polymetal and Integra.