I’m a few days behind on this as I’ve been busy with other parts of this website, but there have been a number of developments since my post last week regarding how Russia discusses its currency maneuvers. The specific language used here is VERY important, so bear with me as I get nitpicky.
First, the facts as reported by various news outlets whose links are embedded within each bullet point:
“We are not going to significantly change the structure of ourinvestments. Ten billion is not a significant change (in currencyreserve holdings). A serious change is when we used to invest $100billion in Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, but no longer do. In the nearestfuture, I do not see major changes in our policy in relation to thedollar.”
“I don’t see the dollar as being weak, I think the dollar has beentoday correctly valued by the market. We see a dollar which today isstronger than one year ago….so I don’t see today a weak dollar and Idon’t forecast that we would have to expect many changes in the comingtime.”
Now for some additional items buried deeper in the above stories that are worth noting:
Here’s what did NOT happen regarding the currency issue while all of this was going on:
Finally, some concluding comments and observations of mine:
Recent history is riddled with examples of unfulfilled promises fromgovernment officials owing to a variety of reasons. When it comes toeconomy-related promises, the current state of affairs is such thatwith new information needs being revealed daily, if not morefrequently, the value of any promise or intent is only truly realizedupon delivery. The more colloquial way of saying this: Talk is cheap.
Interpreting that notion in the Russian context is entirelysubjective. The Russian government may go back on its promise to buyIMF bonds; it may go back on its outlook of having full confidence inthe dollar; it may do some combination of both. Either way, it appearsvery likely that what government officials truly want for the Russianeconomy will not be executable from a practical standpoint. To theextent that this is the case, no matter what the government does toaddress the broad array of economic challenges it faces, it willinevitably fall short of getting it 100 percent right. But regrettableoutcomes can be minimized if the right questions are asked and coursesof action are determined more on the basis of rationality than oncatering to semi-informed politically palatable outbursts.